← All software comparisons

Coperniq vs Service Autopilot: Field Service Software Comparison

Compare the public evidence ServiceDax documented for Coperniq and Service Autopilot. Select another platform below to open a different permanent comparison URL.

vs
Comparison pointCoperniqService Autopilot
Documented scoreC 67/100C 66/100
Evidence confidenceHighHigh
LocationSan Francisco, California notice address; public Facebook and app-store records also show San Diego addresses that Coperniq has not publicly reconciledAtlanta, Georgia, United States
Legal entityCoperniq Inc., a Delaware corporation in the public MSA; state file number/certificate of good standing was not retrievedBACKTELL, LLC; Service Autopilot is a product of Xplor Technologies
PhoneCorporate site: +1 619-279-5504; Google Play developer contact: +1 858-405-6465(972) 728-4040
PricingCurrent public list prices are Field at $90/user/month and Office at $200/user/month. Platform seats, Coperniq Intelligence, and voice agents are separately priced; the public page does not show those rates, minimums, implementation fees, taxes, usage charges, billing cadence, or trial terms.Annual-subscription rates: Startup $49/month, Pro $199/month, Pro Plus $499/month, plus an unpriced sign-up fee. Elite and several add-ons require a quote.
ContractThe public MSA makes term, start/end dates, and subscription fees Order-Form dependent. Unless an Order Form says otherwise, fees are due in advance, payable within 30 days, and described as non-refundable and non-cancellable. Public material did not establish ordinary convenience cancellation, auto-renewal/non-renewal, or a separate refund policy.Product-specific terms override Xplor's general 60-day notice with 30 days' written notice and renewal matching the initial term. They permit a 7% annual increase and restrict mid-term tier and license reductions. The Order Form controls the signed deal; payment services can involve Clearent.
Third-party assuranceVendor security controls documentedVendor security controls documented
SecurityThe public MSA and Privacy Policy describe industry-standard measures, encryption/SSL, firewalls, access controls, breach process, U.S.-based servers, and privacy/service-provider roles. ServiceDax did not locate a Coperniq-specific public SOC 2/ISO artifact, CSA STAR record, TrustPartners listing, public DPA, complete subprocessor register, or public trust-center artifact.Vendor-issued material describes encrypted transfer and storage, U.S. hosting, hourly backups, real-time redundancy, tokenization, and accredited hosting data centers. Public contract and privacy terms address personal data, breach notice, and subprocessors. ServiceDax did not verify a current application-level SOC report, public ISO certificate, matching CSA STAR listing, TrustPartners record, or dedicated public trust center.
Data exitAfter expiration or termination, the MSA provides 14 days of limited platform access to export one copy of stored Customer Content/Data, then says Coperniq has no further obligation. CSV export and broad API/file-retrieval paths are documented, but public material does not promise a complete export manifest, media/audit-history scope, re-importability, assisted exit, deletion certificate, or backup-retention deadline.The agreement says Xplor will, when reasonably practical and after reasonable request and notice, return or delete client personal data after termination. A public tutorial documents selected-list export to Excel or Google Sheets. ServiceDax did not verify a complete account-export manifest, fixed retrieval window, buyer-selected format, or no-cost exit process.
Independent reviews15617
Research date2026-10-072026-09-11
Profile updated2026-10-142026-10-15
Operational fit (max 22)1921
Integration & data sync (max 14)126
Adoption & mobile (max 14)1011
Support & reliability (max 14)76
Commercial clarity (max 10)56
Security, privacy & exit (max 18)89
Company transparency (max 8)67

A higher number means ServiceDax found more documentation in public sources. It does not mean the product is better. Read both research files before deciding.