← All software comparisons

Coperniq vs Workiz: Field Service Software Comparison

Compare the public evidence ServiceDax documented for Coperniq and Workiz. Select another platform below to open a different permanent comparison URL.

vs
Comparison pointCoperniqWorkiz
Documented scoreC 67/100B 77/100
Evidence confidenceHighHigh
LocationSan Francisco, California notice address; public Facebook and app-store records also show San Diego addresses that Coperniq has not publicly reconciledSan Diego, California, United States
Legal entityCoperniq Inc., a Delaware corporation in the public MSA; state file number/certificate of good standing was not retrievedWorkiz, Inc.
PhoneCorporate site: +1 619-279-5504; Google Play developer contact: +1 858-405-6465(855) 790-7363
PricingCurrent public list prices are Field at $90/user/month and Office at $200/user/month. Platform seats, Coperniq Intelligence, and voice agents are separately priced; the public page does not show those rates, minimums, implementation fees, taxes, usage charges, billing cadence, or trial terms.Standard, Pro, and Ultimate feature tiers are public; paid-plan pricing requires a quote. A seven-day trial is advertised.
ContractThe public MSA makes term, start/end dates, and subscription fees Order-Form dependent. Unless an Order Form says otherwise, fees are due in advance, payable within 30 days, and described as non-refundable and non-cancellable. Public material did not establish ordinary convenience cancellation, auto-renewal/non-renewal, or a separate refund policy.Terms state a default 12-month term with automatic 12-month renewal unless either party gives at least 30 days' written non-renewal notice; fees are generally non-refundable and annual increases of up to 10% are permitted with notice.
Third-party assuranceVendor security controls documentedVendor security controls documented
SecurityThe public MSA and Privacy Policy describe industry-standard measures, encryption/SSL, firewalls, access controls, breach process, U.S.-based servers, and privacy/service-provider roles. ServiceDax did not locate a Coperniq-specific public SOC 2/ISO artifact, CSA STAR record, TrustPartners listing, public DPA, complete subprocessor register, or public trust-center artifact.The Trust Center publishes a management commitment to an information-security system in accordance with ISO 27001 requirements. No public ISO certificate, SOC 2 report metadata, matching CSA STAR record, or TrustPartners record with supporting evidence was located under the reviewed Workiz names.
Data exitAfter expiration or termination, the MSA provides 14 days of limited platform access to export one copy of stored Customer Content/Data, then says Coperniq has no further obligation. CSV export and broad API/file-retrieval paths are documented, but public material does not promise a complete export manifest, media/audit-history scope, re-importability, assisted exit, deletion certificate, or backup-retention deadline.PDF and CSV report export is documented. The reviewed public record did not establish a complete-account export or fixed post-termination retrieval period; terms say access ends at termination and content may be permanently deleted.
Independent reviews153113
Research date2026-10-072026-09-03
Profile updated2026-10-142026-09-03
Operational fit (max 22)1920
Integration & data sync (max 14)1213
Adoption & mobile (max 14)1013
Support & reliability (max 14)711
Commercial clarity (max 10)57
Security, privacy & exit (max 18)85
Company transparency (max 8)68

A higher number means ServiceDax found more documentation in public sources. It does not mean the product is better. Read both research files before deciding.