← All software comparisons

Coperniq vs Zoho FSM: Field Service Software Comparison

Compare the public evidence ServiceDax documented for Coperniq and Zoho FSM. Select another platform below to open a different permanent comparison URL.

vs
Comparison pointCoperniqZoho FSM
Documented scoreC 67/100A 87/100
Evidence confidenceHighHigh
LocationSan Francisco, California notice address; public Facebook and app-store records also show San Diego addresses that Coperniq has not publicly reconciledGlobal supplier; U.S. buyers contract with Zoho Corporation (US), while Zoho’s corporate headquarters are in Chennai, India
Legal entityCoperniq Inc., a Delaware corporation in the public MSA; state file number/certificate of good standing was not retrievedZoho Corporation (US) for U.S. customers; the applicable entity varies by customer region
PhoneCorporate site: +1 619-279-5504; Google Play developer contact: +1 858-405-6465U.S. support: +1 (888) 900-9646; published U.S. sales numbers also available
PricingCurrent public list prices are Field at $90/user/month and Office at $200/user/month. Platform seats, Coperniq Intelligence, and voice agents are separately priced; the public page does not show those rates, minimums, implementation fees, taxes, usage charges, billing cadence, or trial terms.Appointment-volume pricing is public: Free includes 30 appointments/month. At 60 appointments, Standard, Professional, and Premium are listed at $30, $45, and $55 monthly or $300, $420, and $480 annually. Published bands extend to 50,000 appointments/month, with tier-specific limits.
ContractThe public MSA makes term, start/end dates, and subscription fees Order-Form dependent. Unless an Order Form says otherwise, fees are due in advance, payable within 30 days, and described as non-refundable and non-cancellable. Public material did not establish ordinary convenience cancellation, auto-renewal/non-renewal, or a separate refund policy.FSM documents cancellation to Free, normally preserving paid access through the paid period unless immediately downgraded. Zoho’s general Terms state auto-renewal and a seven-day pre-renewal notice requirement; confirm the country, edition, and operative order form. Public trial copy conflicts between 15 and 14 days.
Third-party assuranceVendor security controls documentedPublic compliance scope statement
SecurityThe public MSA and Privacy Policy describe industry-standard measures, encryption/SSL, firewalls, access controls, breach process, U.S.-based servers, and privacy/service-provider roles. ServiceDax did not locate a Coperniq-specific public SOC 2/ISO artifact, CSA STAR record, TrustPartners listing, public DPA, complete subprocessor register, or public trust-center artifact.FSM’s security page documents AES-256 encryption, profile permissions, audit logs, PII controls, and controlled export. Zoho’s public compliance page says SOC 2 Type 2 and named ISO programs apply to all Zoho cloud services; ServiceDax did not inspect the restricted underlying reports or certificates.
Data exitAfter expiration or termination, the MSA provides 14 days of limited platform access to export one copy of stored Customer Content/Data, then says Coperniq has no further obligation. CSV export and broad API/file-retrieval paths are documented, but public material does not promise a complete export manifest, media/audit-history scope, re-importability, assisted exit, deletion certificate, or backup-retention deadline.FSM documents module CSV-in-ZIP export, separate attachment backups, record/access limits, retention and deletion windows, and the boundary that already-synchronized downstream data remains unaffected. Treat this as a documented exit path to test, not proof of a complete database snapshot or downstream erasure.
Independent reviews15150
Research date2026-10-072026-09-22
Profile updated2026-10-142026-10-01
Operational fit (max 22)1921
Integration & data sync (max 14)1213
Adoption & mobile (max 14)1014
Support & reliability (max 14)710
Commercial clarity (max 10)59
Security, privacy & exit (max 18)814
Company transparency (max 8)66

A higher number means ServiceDax found more documentation in public sources. It does not mean the product is better. Read both research files before deciding.